Legal Opinion

Beaird v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 7 Div. 722PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The witnesses having been put under the rule, it was within the discretion of the court to permit the bailiff of the court to remain in the courtroom,' and then allow him to testify as a witness. Riley v. State, 88 Ala. 193, 7 So. 149; Barnes v. State, 88 Ala. 204, 7 So. 88, 16 Am. St. Rep. 48; Roberts v. State, 122 Ala. 47, 25 So. 238.

George Duffy was examined as a witness on a former trial of this case, and Ms testimony given on that trial was admitted in evidence over the objection of defendant on the ground that it was not shown that he was permanently out of the state. The evidence in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Smarr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Birmingham Electric Co. v. MannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API