Fricker v. Uddo & Taormina Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Plaintiffs, claiming that they are the assignees of part of the proceeds of a tomato crop which George Kikuchi had agreed to grow and sell to defendant canning company, seek to recover the amount of a crop order given to them by Kikuchi and accepted by defendant. * Defendant has appealed from an adverse judgment contending that it is not supported by the evidence.
The case was submitted on stipulated facts which may be summarized as follows:
In March 1952 Kikuchi agreed to grow a tomato crop and to sell it to defendant. The contract provided that in the event defendant should advance moneys to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Floeck v. HooverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- McGill v. BaumgartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Peden Iron & Steel Co. v. McKnightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cleveland v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.