Legal Opinion

Rush v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1972No. 5726PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant was found guilty of assault with intent to kill. When the prosecuting witness completed her direct examination she was asked if she had made a statement to police officers and she answered in the affirmative. Thereupon counsel for appellant asked that the prosecuting attorney furnish appellant’s counsel with a copy of the statement. The request was refused and appellant contends the State, in failing to comply with Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-2011.3 (Supp. 1971), committed reversible error.

The statute to which we refer comes from Acts 1971 Act 381. The section is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. William H. Leach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Lytle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Lytle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API