Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Corsair Gaming, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 19, 2022No. 4:22-cv-00312Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANTONIO MCKINNEY, and CLINT Case No. 22-cv-00312-CRB SUNDEEN, each individually and on 9 behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 10 Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 v. 12 CORSAIR GAMING, INC., 13 Defendant. 14 Plaintiffs Antonio McKinney and Clint Sundeen allege that Defendant Corsair 15 Gaming, Inc.’s (“Corsair”) packaging of and advertisements for its computer memory 16 cards contain deceptive and misleading statements, in violation of the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.