Legal Opinion

Kelly v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1936No. 7942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing states that this court erred in failing to review the question presented and raised by appellant’s specifications of error numbered I, II, and III; that this was the only question passed on by the District Court; and that the consideration thereof would not require an examination of the evidence. These specifications are as follows

“I. The Court erred in holding that a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is res adjudicata and binding upon the bankruptcy court, the said decision of the Board of Tax Appeals not having become final before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Du BoisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ShingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Anderson v. OdishoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Schuler v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API