Legal Opinion

Aureal, Inc. v. I/O Magic Corp. (In Re Aureal, Inc.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided May 22, 2002No. 17-03031Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

LESLIE J. TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff Aureal, Inc. (“Aureal”), the above-captioned chapter 11 debtor, moves for summary judgment in the above-captioned adversary proceeding. Defendant I/O Magic Corporation (“Magic”) seeks leave to amend its answer (the “Answer”) to add an affirmative defense of recoupment. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Magic’s motion to amend the Answer and grants in part and denies in party AureaFs motion for summary judgment.

SUMMARY OF FACTS

Prior to the commencement of this chapter 11 case, Aureal sold digital audio imaging…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,372 in Re Nathan Davidovich and Amy Jill Davidovich, Debtors. Nathan Davidovich and Christine Jobin, Trustee v. Charles WeltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API