Commonwealth v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
Appellants Odell Bradley and Carol Bradley, husband and wife, were convicted after a jury trial of murder of the third degree. Post-trial motions were filed, argued and denied, and this direct appeal followed. 1
The principal question raised is whether the evidence was insufficient to sustain the murder conviction. In determining whether the evidence presented is sufficient to sustain the conviction, the test is whether, accepting as true all of the evidence of the Commonwealth and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom, upon which if believed, a finder of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. EilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. LowrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. OatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. WojdakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.