Legal Opinion

Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. Fortney

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 18, 1972No. [No. 159, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Board) complains because it was ordered to pay appellees, Frances M. Fortney et al., (Fortney) on a default judgment obtained against appellant Mark J. Haselbauer (Haselbauer) during the time that he was in the military service, without any attempt to comply with the provisions of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 (50 U.S.C. App. § 520). Under Maryland Rule 871, we shall remand the case for further proceedings without affirmance or reversal.

Appellants raised three points, namely (1) whether oral notice to a representative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Douglas v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Maryland Trust Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. St. Joseph Hospital v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Mass Transit Administration v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Bright v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Anderson v. General Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Usemco, Inc. v. Marbro Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API