Legal Opinion

Baird v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 1973No. 11700PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

Wrongful death actions arising from a single event — a motorcycle with driver and passenger collided with a train. Many questions are raised. The deceased were ages 19 and 17, respectively, and unmarried— a man and a woman. A verdict of $100,000 for each of their personal representatives was retmned.

One issue mandates reversal and remandment — briefly stated, it is the interjection of punitive damages by way of instruction and argument. This case came about through an instruction tendered by plaintiffs which quoted substantially verbatim from an Illinois Commerce Commission Rule (Rule 205,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saunders v. SchultzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hartray v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Conant v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Baird v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ralston v. PloggerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. McGrady v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Mattyasovszky v. West Towns Bus Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Roberson v. WoodDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API