Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Akuba

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2004No. NonePublished

1DissentMeierhenry, Justice

[¶ 59.] I join Justice Sabers’ dissent.

[¶ 60.] I also disagree that we should lower the standard of proof required of the State to prove voluntary consent to a war-rantless search.17 Today, the majority reduces the State’s burden of proving voluntary consent from the clear and convincing standard to the preponderance standard. It does so without any compelling reason. The majority gives as reasons (1) conformity with the burden of proof used by the United States Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, (2) conformity with other courts that do not require clear and convincing…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. IbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API