Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Miller

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1979No. Docket 77-824, 77-825, 77-939, 77-945Published

1DissentR. M. Maher, J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree that defendants suffered no prejudice from the method used to select the jury. I likewise agree that no prejudicial error resulted from the denial of separate trials and from the admission of the defendants’ statements at trial.

Although I am of the opinion that impeachment by high misdemeanors should be permitted, I do not believe that the Supreme Court opinion in People v Renno, 392 Mich 45; 219 NW2d 422 (1974), can be read as authorizing such a rule. Until the Supreme Court holds otherwise, I believe that Renno must be construed to prohibit impeach*225ment by all…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. RennoMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. MarkhamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API