Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kittitas Cnty., Corp. v. Sky Allphin, Abc Holdings, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 2017No. 93562-9Published

1Dissent

YU, J. (dissenting)

¶ 48 I agree with the majority on many points in this case. The content of the disputed e-mails is clearly work product, so unless the protections of the work product doctrine have been waived, the e-mails are exempt from production in accordance with the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW. Majority at 1240-41; RCW 42.56.290. And I agree with the implied waiver doctrine as articulated by the majority in this case:

A party waives its work product protection when "the client, the client's lawyer, or another authorized agent of the client ... discloses the material to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API