Lytle v. Peters
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. Trover in justice’s court by David Lytle against the Southern Michigan Fruit Association, Fred Young, and James N. Peters. From a judgment for plaintiff against defendants Peters and Young, said Peters appealed to the circuit court. Discontinuance as to the Southern Michigan Fruit Association was entered. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Peters brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On the 22d day of November, 1906, James N. Peters, the defendant, entered into a contract with one Fred Young, whereby he leased to Young 247 acres of land in Van Burén county, containing a vineyard, for the term of three years. In consideration of the lease, Young agreed ‘5 to farm all said land and work it in due time and in a good, thorough, workmanlike and farmerlike manner, and plant and sow and.raise such crops as said parties shall mutually agree upon from time to time, and deliver one-half of everything raised on said farm at market in the village of Lawton in due season.” By a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alfred Shrimpton & Sons v. CulverMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Galvin v. Galvin Brass & Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Thrift v. HanerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938