Legal Opinion

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 95 OAG 123

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided August 12, 2010No. 95 OAG 123Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gen. 123] 123 COURTS AND JUDGES C RIMINAL P ROCEDURE – F EES – C OSTS – A SSESSMENT OF “C OSTS OF P ROSECUTION” FOR WHICH A CONVICTED DEFENDANT IS LIABLE August 12, 2010 The Honorable Joel J. Todd State’s Attorney for Worcester County You have asked for an interpretation of certain provisions of the Annotated Code of Maryland concerning the assessment of the “costs of prosecution” against a person convicted of a crime. In particular, you ask who assesses these costs and how they are determined. You indicate that there has been a disagreement with the Public Defender’s Office as to whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. O'ConorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Reese v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. United States v. Scott E. Mink, Also Known as ScooterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Medley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API