Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barbour v. Department of Social Services

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1988No. Docket 98339, 98340, 100278, 100554, 100713PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasley, P.J.

In these consolidated cases, we decide whether plaintiffs, with claims against the state under the Civil Rights Act 1 and the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, 2 possess the right to jury trials.

Plaintiff Michael Barbour brought an action against defendant Michigan Department of Social Services under the Civil Rights Act, alleging that he was forced to take a medical leave of absence from his employment as a dss foster care worker due to continuous sexual harassment by his coworkers and supervisors.

Plaintiff Bobbie P. Lucas brought an action against defendant dss under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Marsh v. Department of Civil ServiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Conservation Department v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Hackett v. Ferndale City ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anzaldua v. BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. GIANNETTI BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. YoungMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Jane Doe v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Anzaldua v. BandMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API