United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to1 the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky; Walter Evans, Judge. Action by the United States against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. There was a judgment in part for the United States, and the United States brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
A clerk employed in the United State» postoffice, at Henderson, Ky., stole from .the mails, three registered packages, each containing unsigned national hank notes printed by the United States Treasury Department for the Henderson National Bank, of Henderson, Ky., and by the department delivered to the Riggs National Bank, of Washington, D. C., as the agent of the Henderson National Bank, and by the Riggs Bank mailed to its principal. Notes of the face value oí more than $4,000 were never recovered, more than $3,000 thereof having been put into circulation by the thief…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- National Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Turk v. Illinois Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- United States v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
- McKemy v. Supreme Lodge A. O. U. W.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oxford Production Credit Ass'n v. Bank of OxfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
- Staples v. Central Surety & Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Netherlands American Steam Nav. Co. v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Stinchcomb v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Seward v. National Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.