State Ex Rel. Wolfe v. Richards
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The court find that the demurrer is well taken and is therefore sustained and the petition in mandamus.is dismissed for the following reasons: Under Section 6, Article IV of the state Constitution, the authority to find and determine whether a judgment upon which the judges of a Court of Appeals had agreed is in conflict with a judgment pronounced upon the same question by another Court of Appeals is vested exclusively in the judges of the Court of Appeals who have agreed upon such conflicting judgment. The question whether or not such conflict exists is not open to review by this court. If…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Flury v. Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- State ex rel. Sylvania Home Telephone Co. v. RichardsOhio Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Birdsall v. StephensonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Foreman v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Kendrick v. Parker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Krueger v. KruegerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State ex rel. Birdsall v. StephensonOhio Supreme Court · 1994