Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chidsey v. Mallen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This appeal brings.up for review an ancillary proceeding instituted by the attorney general for judicial aid in the course of an investigation conducted by one of his deputies, and several employes of the state’s bank ing department:' The court denied the attorney general’s application, who then took this appeal. As authority for the proceeding in the court below, the attorney general relied, on sections 520 and 904 of The Administrative Code (Act of April 9, 1929, P. L. 177, as amended), 71 PS 200 and 71 PS 294. Section 520 provides: “Every administrative…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wiley v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Conestoga National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Soja v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Pennsylvania Crime Commission PetitionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.