Legal Opinion
Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 3, 2012No. AC 32390PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Brenda Ungerland, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her complaint against the defendants, Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc. (Morgan Stanley), and Sharon Kells, an agent of Morgan Stanley. The plaintiff alleges that the court improperly determined that her claims amounted to a collateral attack on an arbitration award and erroneously decided as a result that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider them. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following undisputed facts are relevant to our consideration of the plaintiffs appeal. The…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Woodruff v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Caltabiano v. L & L Real Estate Holdings II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Connecticut Superior Court · 2010
4Cited by2 opinions
- Girolametti v. Michael Horton Assocs., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. WindhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013