Pelz v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The indictment charged appellants in nine substantive counts of violation of the mail fraud statutes (section 215 U. S. Criminal Code, 18 USCA § 338), and in the tenth count with conspiracy to violate the statute (section 37 U. S. Criminal Code, 18 USCA § 88). They were acquitted on the substantive counts and convicted on the conspiracy count.
Pelz-Greenstein Company, Inc., was a New York corporation, and the áppellants were its officers. The name was changed to the Consolidated Factors’ Corporation. The crime of conspiracy, of which appellants have heen convicted, rests…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Farmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- McLendon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. DilliardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. James Sutton Regan, Jack Z. Rabinowitz, Steven Barry Smotrich, Charles M. Zarzecki, Paul A. Berkman, and Bruce Lee NewbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.