Legal Opinion

Pickard v. Bryant

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Leelanáw. (Bamsdell, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facta are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.

This is an action of trespass, brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, under-sheriff of Leelanaw county, to recover the value of certain personal property taken by said under-sheriff, and also for damage done to plaintiff’s business by such taking. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court for the value of the goods taken.

The goods in question were seized upon a writ of attachment in favor of Storm & Hill against Nelson & Co., and it was claimed that the property was that of Nelson & Co., as Pickard was not a good-faith purchaser *433as against the creditors of Nelson & Co. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toohey v. PlummerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Snell v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hileman v. IndreicaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hileman v. IndreicaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API