Hileman v. Indreica
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
385 Mich. 1 (1971)
187 N.W.2d 411
HILEMAN
v.
INDREICA
No. 8 October Term 1970, Docket No. 52,429.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided June 1, 1971.
Welday, Goldstone, Boila & Ott (Michell L. Bacow, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Metry, Metry, Sanom, Ashare & Goldman (by Dennis M. Matulewicz), for defendants on appeal.
2Per curiam
This is an action under the dramshop act (CLS 1961, § 436.22 [Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 18.993]), brought by the surviving widow of one Hileman on behalf of herself and his minor children. The jury's verdict was no cause. Division 2 affirmed (15 Mich App 662). We granted leave (383 Mich 751)…
3Cases cited34 opinions
- Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Bullard v. . PearsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.