Legal Opinion

Hileman v. Indreica

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1971No. 8 October Term 1970, Docket No. 52,429Published

1Opinion of the Court

385 Mich. 1 (1971)

187 N.W.2d 411

HILEMAN

v.

INDREICA

No. 8 October Term 1970, Docket No. 52,429.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 1, 1971.

Welday, Goldstone, Boila & Ott (Michell L. Bacow, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Metry, Metry, Sanom, Ashare & Goldman (by Dennis M. Matulewicz), for defendants on appeal.

2Per curiam

This is an action under the dramshop act (CLS 1961, § 436.22 [Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 18.993]), brought by the surviving widow of one Hileman on behalf of herself and his minor children. The jury's verdict was no cause. Division 2 affirmed (15 Mich App 662). We granted leave (383 Mich 751)…

3Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hickory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. DellabondaMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Breckon v. Franklin Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Bullard v. . PearsallNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API