Legal Opinion

Schanen-Blair Co. v. Sisters of Charity of the House of Providence

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1914No. 11403PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, McM'aster, J., entered January 2, 1913, dismissing an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, upon granting a nonsuit.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The appellant, O. E. Heintz, brought an action to foreclose a subcontractor’s lien upon a certain building, constructed at Vancouver, Washington, by the respondent, Sisters of Charity of the House of Providence, a corporation. The principal contractors, Moore and Hardin, defaulted while the work was going on. Appellant performed his contract and filed a lien for the balance of the amount due him under the contract. It appeared upon the trial that plaintiff had not given the notice required by statute, and for that reason his lien failed, under the authority of the following cases: Hallett v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. DillonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pacific Iron & Steel Works v. GoerigWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hallett v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Architectural Decorating Co. v. NicklasonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dolan v. CainWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reifsnyder v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Northern State Construction Co. v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Columbia Security Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Bromley v. McHughWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stimson Mill Co. v. Feigenson Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API