Legal Opinion

Orr v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1928No. 2995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

Appellees, L. A. McDaniel and wife, who were plaintiffs below, sued and obtained judgment against appellant, G. H. Orr, for $612, on the alleged ground that appellant received from appellees $250 in excess.of the legal rate of interest,' and this appeal involves the questions arising on that trial.

The first error assigned is that the trial court erred in giving a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiffs in that court.

The plaintiffs, in their petition, allege that, on or about August 4,1925, plaintiffs, as owners of certain real estate in the town of Sla-ton,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Mitchell v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. C. C. Slaughter Co. v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Andrews v. HoxieTexas Supreme Court · 1849

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Orr v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Summit v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API