Legal Opinion

Orr v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 5, 1929No. 3249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

The plaintiffs, L. A. McDaniel and his wife, Ava McDaniel, in a suit in the district court of Lubbock county, Tex., recovered a judgment against the defendant, G. H. Orr, for the sum of $612, based on their contention that the defendant had collected, on a loan which he made to them, the sum of $250, more than 10 per cent, interest for the use of the money.

This is the second appeal in this ease, and, for a statement of the pleadings, we refer to the opinion of Judge Randolph in the former appeal, 5 S.W.(2d) 175, 178, in which a judgment for the plaintiffs was reversed and the cause remanded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bank of the United States v. Waggener and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. Sugg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Mitchell v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Moser v. John F. Buckner & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Jowell v. BillingsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API