Legal Opinion

Edna L. Duggins v. Colonial Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1963No. 8865_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

We are concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict for the plaintiff who claimed damages for an injury she suffered when she fell in one of the defendant’s stores. We conclude that, under the laws of North Carolina, the evidence was insufficient and that judgment non obstante veredicto should have been entered for the defendant.

Mrs. Duggins, with her husband, was-shopping one evening in one of the defendant’s grocery stores. Her foot, slipped in an oily liquid on the floor, and she fell, sustaining some injury for which she seeks compensation.

T…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Taylor Furnishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Bowden v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Revis v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Pratt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Faircloth v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API