Legal Opinion

Eastroads, Inc. v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1991No. 88-1026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Eastroads, Inc., filed a petition for declaratory judgment against the defendants-appellees, City of Omaha (City) and Varnum Armstrong Deeter, Inc. (Varnum), to declare a rezoning ordinance invalid, arbitrary, capricious, and illegal and to enjoin the defendants from recognizing the ordinance and from commencing any construction on the property in question. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and that defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The defendants’ motion was granted,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heath v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Beall v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Wachtel by and Through Wachtel v. BeerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Mountain Air RanchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Damick v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flynn v. BauschNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Smith v. City of PapillionNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Ranch v. Farm Credit Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Newman v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SantosNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API