Legal Opinion

Croisant v. Watrud

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is a suit in equity for an accounting brought against co-partners in a firm of certified public' ac countants and the executrix of a deceased partner, LaVern Watrud. Plaintiff appeals from a decree in favor of defendants.

We shall refer to the deceased partner, Watrud, as one of the defendants. The defendants engaged in the accounting practice with their principal office in Klamath Palls and their branch office in Medford. Watrud was in charge of the Medford office.

Plaintiff was the owner of a sawmill, timberlands, and other property over which she exercised general control, delegating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Wootton Land & Fuel Co. v. OwnbeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Pappathanos v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Cafritz v. Corporation Audit Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1945

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Phillips v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Roach v. MeadOregon Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API