Herschenhart v. Mehlman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.
When the plaintiff left his automobile in the garage then owned by Gottlieb & Silver, with a person unidentified, the presumption is that that person was the agent of Gottlieb & Silver and was authorized to accept such car for storage. (Nebenzahl v. Fargo, 15 Daly, 130; 4 N. Y. Supp. 554; Dunn v. Star Fire Ins. Co., 19 Wkly. Dig. 531; Norris v. Kohler, 41 N. Y. 42; Wood Mast. & Serv. 584.) It appears that plaintiff obtained from that person a receipt which shows…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norris v. . KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Austin v. . DyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Nebenzahl v. FargoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
- Nebenzahl v. FargoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Ingram v. Machel & Jr. Auto Repair, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Parker v. P & N Recovery of New York, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- Lewis v. Jim's Boat Yard, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1972
- Susi v. Belle Acton Stables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.