Legal Opinion

Herschenhart v. Mehlman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 16, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

When the plaintiff left his automobile in the garage then owned by Gottlieb & Silver, with a person unidentified, the presumption is that that person was the agent of Gottlieb & Silver and was authorized to accept such car for storage. (Nebenzahl v. Fargo, 15 Daly, 130; 4 N. Y. Supp. 554; Dunn v. Star Fire Ins. Co., 19 Wkly. Dig. 531; Norris v. Kohler, 41 N. Y. 42; Wood Mast. & Serv. 584.) It appears that plaintiff obtained from that person a receipt which shows…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norris v. . KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Austin v. . DyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Nebenzahl v. FargoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
  4. Nebenzahl v. FargoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Ingram v. Machel & Jr. Auto Repair, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Parker v. P & N Recovery of New York, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1999
  4. Lewis v. Jim's Boat Yard, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1972
  5. Susi v. Belle Acton Stables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API