Legal Opinion

R. F. Downing & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 29, 1954No. 58230; protest 180006-K (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this controversy consists of watchcases of domestic origin in which foreign-made watch movements were cased in the free zone and the combined cases and movements exported to China. Subsequently, the same watches were returned to the free zone and then entered the United States. There is no question as to the compliance with the provisions of the American goods returned regulations. Duty was assessed upon the foreign watch movements at specific rates and upon the American-made watchcases at appropriate ad valorem rates under the Tariff Act of 1930.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. S. H. Pomerance Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Universal Form Clamp Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API