Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re Glicksberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 11, 1932Published
1DissentMartin, J.
I dissent and vote to affirm. The transaction under consideration was the purchase and sale of a *544money order or credit. The agreement printed in this record provides “ Terms and Conditions Agreed Upon Between Purchaser and Bank in Reference to Within Money Order.” The terms are then stated in the agreement. The relation between the bank and the purchaser of the money order or credit was that of debtor and creditor. (Safian v. Irving National Bank, 202 App. Div. 459; affd., 236 N. Y. 513; Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co., 172 App. Div. 16; Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Musco v. . United Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Beecher v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Musco v. United Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.