Legal Opinion
Delaware Consol. Oil Co. v. Randall
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 16, 1929No. 481PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNAMER, District Judge.
The complainant, the Delaware Consolidated Oil Company, seeks to restrain the respondent Max W. Randall, holder of a tax certificate, from obtaining a tax deed from the county treasurer of Nowata county, Oklahoma.
The complainant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware and authorized and licensed to do business in the state of Oklahoma, and is the owner of an oil and gas mining lease covering 110 acres of land located in Nowata county, Oklahoma. According to the allegations of the complainant’s bill, it is engaged in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ogden City v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gibson v. ShufeldtSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Berryman v. Board of Trustees of Whitman CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Russell v. StansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First State Bank v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Adam Schumann Associates, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934