Legal Opinion

Ex Parte: Hansen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus issued by the Supreme Court but made returnable to the Circuit Court (Section 5, Art. V., Const. Fla.), the Circuit Court, upon return to the writ held that the person alleged.to be illegally detained was held under a valid commitment of the County Judge, and that inasmuch as the County Judge had full and complete jurisdiction over the body of said person alleged to be illegally restrained under an order of the County Judge, that it was the duty of the Circuit Court to remand said person to custody of the County Judge’s duly authorized and legally appointed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Deeb v. FabisinskiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  3. Pitts v. PittsSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Ex parte ScudamoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Hancock v. DupreeSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Krivitsky v. NyeSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. American Surety Co. of New York v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974
  5. Ex Parte HansenSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API