Legal Opinion

Patton v. Coen & Ten Broeke C. M. Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Probate Court of Gilpin County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.

This is an action in assumpsit, brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, for the money claimed to be due to the Coen and Ten Broeke Carriage Manufacturing Company, for the use, etc., for a certain omnibus, lead bar, etc., sold and delivered by the defendant in error, to the plaintiff in error.

*266The record shows that Patton, through Abbott, a salaried agent of the company, ordered of the company at Chicago, Illinois, in May, 1874, a certain omnibus, etc., of the value of $885, one-half to be paid in cash upon the receipt and acceptance of the omnibus, and the other half…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitch v. BunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jerome v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Whitehead v. JessupColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Bradbury v. AldenColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Chamberlin v. GilmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Medical Lien Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API