Legal Opinion

Kuehn v. Petrolia Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1925No. 2469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

The Petrolia Supply Company, a corporation, instituted this suit against R. A. Lanning and D. D. Moniger on two promissory notes bearing date June 7, 1921, aggregating the sum of $1,000, payable on demand, without grace, to A. A. Kuehn, agent of the Ridge Oil Company, bearing interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum from maturity, and providing for 10 per cent, attorney’s fees on principal and interest, if suit was brought on the notes. Said notes were for a valuable consideration, and before maturity transferred to plaintiff, and it is the owner and holder thereof.

R. A. Lanning and D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamar v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Amarillo Nat. Bank v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Wichita Falls Compress v. W. L. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Carothers v. ThorpTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Casey v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coulson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Anderton v. DownsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API