Legal Opinion

Lamar v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1923No. 342-3717PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

The Court of Civil Appeals, in an opinion by the late Chief Justice Huff, states the nature of this case accurately, as follows:

“This action was brought by appellant, Lamar, against appellee railway company for damages occasioned by injuries received by his wife on a passenger train of appellee, and while she was a passenger thereon, between Lubbock and Farweil, near Lariat; ‘through some negligence not definitely known to plaintiff, said train had a collision, and was negligently wrecked and jolted and jarred and partially derailed, and shook to such an extent that it threw plaintiff’s said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LehmbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RowlandTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Tisdale v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Ry. Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Southern Traction Co. v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Biener v. St. Louis Public Service Co. (mo.app. 1942)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API