Legal Opinion

Christunas v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 17, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-40429Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY PURSUANT TO FED. R.CRIM.P. 41(e)

GAD OLA, District Judge.

Before the court is a motion by plaintiff, Doris Christunas, for return of property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant plaintiffs motion.

Factual Background

Plaintiff, Doris Christunas, and her husband, Kenneth P. Christunas have been married since July 7, 1973. During.the course of that marriage they have jointly acquired substantial assets including real property, partnership interests and various personal property. On April 21,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 2525 Leroy Lane, West Bloomfield, Michigan, and Leah Liza MarksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Rogers v. RogersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. United States v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API