Legal Opinion
Oladokun v. Correctional Treatment Facility
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 22, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0358PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Re Document Nos.: 7, 14, 17
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and Denying as Moot all Other Pending Motions
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS,United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs “The Amend Motion Regarding Original Complaint Before the Court,” which the Court interprets as a motion to amend the complaint. See ECF No. 17. 1 Defendant, Corrections Corporation of America, has opposed the motion. See ECF No. 21. 2 For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion to amend will be granted.
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, who is proceeding…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beg Investments, LLC v. AlbertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- New Vision Photography Program, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Davis v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Lesesne v. John DoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Burgos v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.