Litva v. Village of Richmond

{¶ 24} In their complaint, appellants raise both due-process and takings claims. Both the village and the trial court addressed the due-process claim, but neither addressed appellants’ takings claim. Accordingly, the trial court’s order is not a final, appealable order, and we do not have jurisdiction to hear this case. Because the majority deals with this case on its merits, I must respectfully dissent from its judgment.

{¶ 25} The parties’ arguments before this court have confused due-process arguments with takings arguments. When dealing with the merits, the majority continues in the same…