Legal Opinion

Stuard v. Southern Engine & Boiler Works

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the chancery court of Harrison county. Hon. T. A. Wood, Chancellor. Suit by the Southern Engine & Boiler Works against J. F. Stuard et al. From a judgment for complainant, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the chancery court of Harrison county. Hon. T. A. Wood, Chancellor. Suit by the Southern Engine & Boiler Works against J. F. Stuard et al. From a judgment for complainant, defendant appeals. On February 1, 1907, J. H. Long was the owner of certain machinery, worth about twelve hundred and sixty dollars, which he had purchased in October, 1906, from the Southern Engine & Boiler Works under an agreement which recited that the title was to be reserved in the Southern Engine & Boiler Works until full payment. This machinery was personal property, being located upon the land of a third…

1Opinion of the Court

Whitfield, C.

The reporter will set out fully the facts in the case. We notice only two assignments of error.

Sections 4341 and 4342 of the Code of 1906 are as follows:

“4341. If the taxes, assessed shall not be paid when due, and sufficient real and personal estate cannot be found of which to levy the same, the collector shall ascertain who are indebted to the person liable for the taxes, an'd shall make a list thereof, and advertise the indebtedness for sale at the courthouse door, giving five days’ notice in the manner prescribed for the sale of personal property distrained; and shall sell…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krug v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lane v. Roma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Byers MacH. Co. v. Cobb Bros. Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API