Legal Opinion

Hanks v. Alexander

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1936No. 5187Published

1Opinion of the Court

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The subject-matter of this case, as disclosed from the bare allegations of the petition, was considered heretofore by this court in passing on an exception of no cause of action sustained by the lower court. 157 So. 772. In that opinion, the allegations of the petition were paraphrased or reproduced as written to such an extent that the theory of plaintiff’s position and the predicate upon which she bases her action against R. C. Alexander, the sole remaining defendant, were clearly revealed. The case was remanded by us for trial on the merits. It is-again before us on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eby v. McLainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Taylor v. RundellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  3. Hanks v. AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Thacker v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  5. Williams v. HornSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API