Legal Opinion

Eby v. McLain

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1909No. 17,330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita; James Pemberton Madison, Judge. Action by Stella Crosley Eby and her husband against L. D. McLain and Kate L. Crosley, individually and as natural tutrix. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

*139Statement of the Case.

NICHOLLS, J.

Plaintiff alleged that C. C. Crosley died in the parish of Ouachita, on the 22d of September, 1888, leaving a widow, Mrs. Kate Crosley, and two minor children, issue of the marriage with the deceased, Stella Crosley (petitioner) and Martha Clayton Crosley. On January 10, 1889, Mrs. Kate Crosley was appointed and confirmed natural tutrix of her children. On the 26th of January, 1889, an inventory of C. C. Crosley’s succession was filed in the clerk’s office, amounting to $20,946, a certified copy of which was recorded in the mortgage book. All of the property…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Heirs of Burney v. LudelingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. Tugwell v. TugwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. Bailie v. Augusta Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Barnard v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Glasscock v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parker v. Ohio Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Soule v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HardmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. Bordelon v. CapersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Hanks v. AlexanderLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API