Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Schmidt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, President Judge:

This is a timely appeal by Square 106 Associates from the trial court’s order denying its claim against the estate of Harold R. Schmidt. Appellant has raised the following issues for our review:

1) whether the orphans’ court division lacked jurisdiction because appellant never presented a claim in the estate proceeding;

2) whether the orphans’ court division lacked jurisdiction because appellant withdrew all its filings prior to the audit;

3) whether the orphans’ court division abused its discretion in striking appellant’s withdrawal of its claim; and

4) whether, by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Abrams WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Estate of StephensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Lamb v. GreenhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Cross's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Siculietano v. K & B AMUSEMENTS CORP.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In re Estate of SchramCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Myers v. Estate of WilksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Bowdoin v. DeckmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API