The Addison E. Bullard
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The question to be determined is whether the vessel was seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage. As preliminary to the- determination of that question, the appellant suggests another. It argues that, as the vessel and her owners were private carriers the burden was on the libelant to make affirmative proof of negligence in failing to make the vessel seaworthy at the commencement of the voyage, and that libelant should prove conclusively that the alleged damage was the direct result, of acts for which the vessel and her owners were responsible by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The WildcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- The FriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Pacific FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- The C. R. ShefferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Salvatore & Emanuele Fili v. 13,986 Bales of Cork ShavingsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. PettersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931