Legal Opinion
Stanislaw Andreej Grzymala-Siedlecki v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1961No. 18318PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOPER, District Judge.
The sole question here presented is whether or not under the undisputed testimony of the appellant (herein referred to as the applicant) he is entitled to naturalization.
His petition for naturalization was rejected by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and was opposed before the trial judge who denied the same. Subsequently however, the Central Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service after a study of the record, requested the trial judge to vacate his order and grant the application, but the judge declined to do so. The office of the Attorney…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Galvan v. PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rowoldt v. PerfettoSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Lum Jung Hop v. Christian A. Herter, as Secretary of State of the United States of America, Lum Jung Seng v. Christian A. Herter, as Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hans E. Langhammer v. James A. Hamilton, District Director Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Firestone v. HowertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Firestone v. HowertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- C.J. Betters, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- In re Naturalization of KlajicDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.