Legal Opinion

Turner v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 2008No. 08AP-568PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyack, J.

{¶ 1} Harry C. Turner III was an employee of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”) when he went on active duty with the United States Navy. Following his return from active duty, he returned to employment with ODRC. Since his return to state employment, he has filed numerous appeals with the State Personnel Board of Review (“SPBR”). This appeal alleged that his rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, Section 4301 et seq., Title 38, U.S.Code (“USERRA”) were not honored.

{¶ 2} The SPBR dismissed this appeal for lack of subject…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patton v. DiemerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rinehart v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Director of Transportation v. Eastlake Land Development Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Camper Care v. Forest River, 08ap-146 (6-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Minkin v. Ohio State Home Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Young v. Ohio State Univ. Hosps.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Hodkinson v. Ohio State Racing Comm'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Daniel v. Cuyahoga Cty. Div. of Children & Family Servs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API