Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Hector J. Cyr Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 25, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

This case comes up on appeals by the petitioners and the respondents to a decree awarding compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Carold L. Chapman was in the employ of Hector J. Cyr Co., Inc. The employer was engaged in constructing a cement bridge across the Androscoggin River between Lisbon Falls and Durham. The employee was engaged as a fireman on the Durham side of the river, and worked from 11:30 at night until 7:30 in the morning. He lived in Lisbon Falls and ordinarily used a truck supplied by himself to reach his place of employment. The Industrial Accident Commissioner…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dumond's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Comeau v. Maine Coastal ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  3. Gordon v. Maine Reduction Company, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Bartley v. CoutureSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  5. Albert v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API