Legal Opinion
Albert v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on an automobile liability insurance policy, brought in Aroostook County Superior Court under R. S., 1944, Chap. 100, Sec. 40. The defendant pleaded no coverage because it claimed that the person who was killed was an employee of the assured plaintiff, and as employee excluded by the policy; and also pleaded that the amount sued for was voluntarily paid by the plaintiff in settlement, without trial as provided in the policy and without the consent of defendant. The plaintiff filed replication stating that the injured man was not an employee at the time of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Butler Bros. v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Interstate Casualty Co. v. Wallins Creek Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Independent Milk & Cream Co. v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Littlefield's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Evanston Insurance Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Thomas W. Hooley & Sons v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Merchants Mutual Insurance v. Transformer Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. PerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Hersey v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.