Legal Opinion
Martin v. Pilot Industries
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 4, 1980No. 79-1762PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
On their appeal in this diversity case under North Carolina law, defendants challenge the district court’s determination by summary judgment that both the corporate defendant, Pilot Industries, Inc., and the individual defendants, Crider and Hartzog, failed to comply with North Carolina’s Business Opportunity Sales Act, N.C.Gen.Stat. §§ 66-94 to -100, when they sold a business franchise to plaintiff James Martin. Concluding that the district court properly found the corporation to have violated the Act, we affirm that part of the district court’s judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Charbonnages De France v. Frank B. Smith, Juanita Smith, Frank Smith, Jr., Smith Brothers Construction Company and Continental Coal Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Hardy v. TolerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The London and Edinburgh Insurance Company, Limited, and the Dominion Insurance Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. American Barmag Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Martin v. Pilot IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980