Lambert v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
This case was tried on count B, a wanton count, and the burden of proof was not therefore upon the defendant, under section 9955 of the Code of 1923. A. G. S. R. Co. v. Smith, 71 So. 455, 196 Ala. 77; Jolley v. Southern R. R., 72 So. 382, 197 Ala. 60; Central of Georgia R. R. v. Moore, 75 So. 971, 200 Ala. 213; D. & N. R. R. v. Jones, 67 So. 691, 191 Ala. 485.
The deceased was killed early in the morning just before or about daylight, and there were but two eyewitnesses to the accident, Joe McCurrie and Lewis Leonard. ’ If the testimony of McCurrie .be. true, the defendant was entitled to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. HeidtmuellerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Alabama Great Southern Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Northern Alabama Ry. Co. v. McGoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zemczonek v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Southern Ry. Co. v. RandleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Lunney v. Southern Railway CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.